You publish a DPP solution

Where the information about you comes from

From your public pages and your documentation, recorded on a date that every cell displays. We use nothing obtained any other way: no account opened under a false identity, no customer content, no internal document.

Every cell carries its level of proof, and the distinction is the same for everyone.

Checked by us

A page, an interface contract or a public route answered at the time of the check, and we state how we verified it.

Publisher's statement

You announce it, we could not exercise it. This is not doubt about your word, it is the state of our verification.

No public information found

We looked and found nothing public. This is the easiest mention to remove: one address is enough.

What you can send us, and what it changes

• A factual error. It is corrected quickly, and the correction appears in our change log with the old value, the new one and the date. A source is enough, you need not invoke any legal text.
• A sourced clarification on a cell marked as a publisher's statement: if it is publicly verifiable, the cell changes level and points to your source.
• A pricing page, documentation, or any page we missed. Several cells read “no public information found” simply because the page exists and we did not see it. One address changes that.
• Test access. This is the only way to move authenticated or paid capabilities into the “checked by us” level, since we cannot exercise them otherwise.
• A reply to a finding. It appears next to that finding, unedited and signed by you. French law grants this right of reply, and we apply it without conditions.

What test access would let us document

A short run, on a fictitious test product, identical across all publishers so that results are comparable. Create the product, publish its passport, read it back without authentication, export it in the formats you offer, call your API (terme du glossaire : définition au survol, au clavier ou au premier appui) if you have one. Nothing else.

We would publish the method, the date, the plan used and the exact scope, stating what the test did not cover. No real data would be entered, no customer content would be accessed, and the access would be returned.

If you would rather not provide access, say so: we will keep presenting you from your public sources, stating that authenticated functions were not tested.

What we will not do

• Sell a position, a highlight, a display order or a colour. Ranking is alphabetical until a reproducible protocol allows anything else.
• Remove a sourced fact because it works against you. A false fact is corrected; an inconvenient one is discussed, and your reply appears beside it.
• Trade a correction, a mention or a link for anything.
• Sign an agreement that would prevent us from publishing an unfavourable finding.

Should a paid link ever exist, it will carry its disclosure before it is clicked, and it will change neither the order nor the content of any cell.

Contact

Write to contact@ja-studio.eu, naming your solution and the specific point that concerns you. We answer, whether or not the request succeeds. The site is published by JA Studio, a French company registered in Paris; full details are in our legal notice.